Compton Observatory Science Report #164, Friday August 22, 1994 Chris Shrader, Compton Observatory Science Support Center Questions or comments can be sent to the CGRO SSC. Phone: 301/286-8434 e-mail: NSI_DECnet: GROSSC::SHRADER Internet: shrader@grossc.gsfc.nasa.gov Spacecraft Status The Observatory, scientific instruments and all spacecraft subsystems continue to function nearly flawlessly. Science Support Center Activities At this point all Cycle-4 Guest Investigators have been notified of the outcomes of their Cycle-4 proposals - if you submitted a proposal and haven't received notification please contact the CGRO- SSC. Planning for Cycle-4, including data distribution and grant management, is underway. Work is ongoing on a BATSE CD Rom, to be distributed this fall. There are several addendums to this report; the first is an announcement for a meeting on short-lived transients (at all wavelengths). The second is an announcement from Dr. Riegler (NASA HQ) regarding grant extensions in support of NASA's education initiative. Instrument Reports EGRET EGRET operations were normal this biweekly period. Delivery of data to the CGRO-SSC remains on schedule. Interaction with guest investigators remains at a good level. EGRET set a record this summer with its first recorded gamma ray above 100 GeV. Based on its direction, it is probably a photon from the high-energy tail of the galactic diffuse emission. We have just received the list of proposed sources for Cycle 4 by viewing period from the CGRO-SSC and are implementing the programs to determine the data rights for any source seen in any viewing period. The SSC has also sent us the list of those guest investigations involving EGRET for which the (proposal) PI wishes to collaborate with the PI Team. The list is long since it involves almost all of those who are approved for EGRET data; Carl Fichtel will be contacting the PIs of those guest investigations over the next three weeks to make arrangements for working together. We are very pleased to continue this cooperation that seems to have worked quite well thus far. OSSE OSSE operations are normal. The new gamma-ray burst observation strategy is now operational. In response to a burst location signal from BATSE, the OSSE detectors will now drive to the position of the burst and map the region for 12 hours, looking for persistent low-level emission or small secondary outbursts. The time from burst onset to arrival of the detectors will be ~10-100 sec, depending on the location, and will be typically ~30 sec. The expected event rate is of order one per month. We are carefully monitoring this new process to ensure that it is functioning properly. In the Target-of-Opportunity viewing period 336.5 (4-9 Aug), the Z-axis target was the recent X-ray nova GRO J1655-40 (PI team), and the X-axis targets were MCG-5-23-16 and PSR 0656+14 (Guest Investigator J. Cordes). The OSSE data were used to improve the source location for identification at other wave- lengths, to generate a high-quality gamma-ray spectrum, and to search for timing noise. Preliminary results are contained in the appended IAU Circular. The OSSE position is consistent with the subsequent optical counterpart (IAUC 6050). In viewing period 337, the Z-axis target is PSR 0656+14 (Guest Investigator J. Cordes), and the X-axis target is NGC 4151 (Guest Investigator M. Maisack). Data from viewing periods 219.4 and 220 were delivered to the Compton GRO Science Support Center archive this week. The targets during period 219.4 were 1E1740.7-2942 and MCG-2-58-22. The targets during period 220 were SMC X-1 and 3C120. The OSSE team contributed the following item to IAU Circular 6051. X-RAY NOVA IN SCORPIUS: R. A. Kroeger, J. E. Grove, J. D. Kurfess, W. N. Johnson, and M. S. Strickman, Naval Research Laboratory, write: "We have further constrained the position determined by BATSE for GRO J1655-40 (IAUC 6046) using the OSSE instrument on the Compton Gamma Ray Observatory. Data from a 1-dimensional scan through the source region constrain the position to be within 0.11 deg (90-percent confidence) of the great circle connecting the following points: R.A. = 16h53m, Decl. = -39o43' (equinox 2000.0); R.A. = 16h59m, Decl. = -41o21'. Our limit overlaps with about 30 percent of the original BATSE error circle and is not consistent with the x-ray source 1ES 1649-403 (cf. IAUC 6048). The gamma-ray spectrum is well-represented by a power-law model that continues to harden with time, with the following spectral indices: Aug. 4, -2.7; 9, -2.4. BATSE's reported spectral index on Aug. 1 was -3.15. Significant source flux is observed to 600 keV." COMPTEL The COMPTEL instrument is performing well and continues routineobservations. One of the 14 lower detector modules of COMPTEL was switched off on August 3 (=TJD 9567); its operating characteristics had steadily degraded in recent months due to three (of seven) increasingly noisy photomultiplier tubes. The loss of a single D2 module reduces the number of COMPTEL "mini-telescopes" (i.e., the number of possible D1/D2 combinations) from its maximum value of 98 down to 91; the operating efficiency of the telescope is therefore slightly reduced, down to 93%. The COMPTEL operations group will periodically reactivate the affected D2 module (with the appropriate incantations) to assess its performance (in hopes of a miraculous recovery). As mentioned in earlier OSSE reports, the BATSE solar flare trigger, previously used by COMPTEL to initiate a solar-flare observing mode, has now been redefined, during this period of solar minimum, as a burst trigger for OSSE use. In the event of increased solar activity, this trigger can be reconfigured to its original state. A quick-look analysis of data taken during the first five days of therecent target-of-opportunity observations of the x-ray nova GROJ1655-40 has been carried out; preliminary results indicate that thereis no strong detection of this source by COMPTEL in the 0.75-1.0 MeV energy range. Finally, a weak cosmic gamma-ray burst was recorded within the field of view of COMPTEL on 28 July. The COMPTEL-determined position for this burst was distributed via the BATSE/COMPTEL/NMSU rapid-response network. The details for this particular event follow: TITLE : COMPTEL BURST POSITION NOTICE: GRB940728 NOTICE_DATE: Thu Aug 4 17:46:00 GMT 1994 ORIG_SENDER: burst@comptel.unh.edu ***************************************************** BURST_DATE : 9561 TJD; 28-JUL-1994 BURST_TIME : 86334.00 SEC; 23:58:54 UT BURST_SCZEN: 15.0 Deg. BURST_SCAZI: 26.8 Deg. BURST_CLASS: Weak (Approx 29 events) ***************************************************** COORD_J2000: [RAsc Decl] [RAsc Decl] ============ =============== ====================== MAXLIK_POS : [ 85.0d -37.8d] = [ 5h40m 9s -37d46m48s] ----------------------------------------------------- ERRBOX1_POS: [ 85.3d -39.3d] = [ 5h41m 4s -39d16m26s] ERRBOX2_POS: [ 83.3d -37.7d] = [ 5h33m 7s -37d39m12s] ERRBOX3_POS: [ 85.1d -36.2d] = [ 5h40m33s -36d13m39s] ERRBOX4_POS: [ 87.1d -37.8d] = [ 5h48m31s -37d49m 1s] ***************************************************** COORD_B1950: [RAsc Decl] [RAsc Decl] ============ =============== ====================== MAXLIK_POS : [ 84.7d -37.8d] = [ 5h38m37s -37d48m20s] ----------------------------------------------------- ERRBOX1_POS: [ 84.9d -39.3d] = [ 5h39m35s -39d17m53s] ERRBOX2_POS: [ 82.9d -37.7d] = [ 5h31m34s -37d41m16s] ERRBOX3_POS: [ 84.7d -36.3d] = [ 5h38m58s -36d15m10s] ERRBOX4_POS: [ 86.7d -37.8d] = [ 5h46m59s -37d49m55s] BATSE The following reports on a transient source in Scorpius were include in IAU Circulars 6046 and 6056 respectively: X-RAY NOVA IN SCORPIUS S. N. Zhang, C. A. Wilson, B. A. Harmon, G. J. Fishman, R. B. Wilson, W. S. Paciesas, M. Scott, and B. C. Rubin report for the Compton Gamma Ray Observatory BATSE team: "An x-ray nova has been observed at R.A. = 16h55m, Decl. = -40o.5 (equinox 2000.0; error radius 0o.3). The source (GRO J1655-40) first appeared in data from July 27 and has increased to its present level of about 1.1 Crab (20-100 keV) on Aug. 1. Significant flux is observed to 200 keV. A power law with a spectral index of -3.15 +/- 0.07 fits the data well from 20 to 200 keV. Pulsed emission is not seen in the period range from 3 to 300 s at a limiting sensitivity of about 10 percent of the steady flux. No previously-cataloged x-ray source is known at this location. It has also been determined that the nearby x-ray pulsar OAO 1657-415, currently observed by BATSE, is not responsible for the observed emission." X-RAY NOVA IN SCORPIUS C. A. Wilson, B. A. Harmon, S. N. Zhang, W. S. Paciesas, G. J. Fishman, M. Scott, B. C. Rubin, and R. B. Wilson report for the Compton Gamma Ray Observatory BATSE Team: "From an examination of individual occultations of GRO J1655-40, we find that the initial rise of the source intensity (about 10-90 percent) in the band 20- 100 keV was between July 27.75 and 28.25 UT. The source was at the 0.85-Crab level from July 28.25 to about Aug. 8 and then decreased to 0.66 Crab from Aug. 9 to 12 (band 20-100 keV; 10 percent uncer- tainty), with significant daily variations. Since Aug. 12, GRO J1655-40 has dropped more rapidly: 0.3 (+/- 0.03) Crab on Aug. 13 and 0.15 (+/- 0.03) Crab on Aug. 14-15. The spectrum extends to at least 200 keV in the early part of the outburst, then to at least 400 keV after Aug. 6. The spectrum softens during initial rise, from -2.5 to about -3.0, and varies between -2.5 and -3.5 after July 28, similar to black-hole candidate x-ray novae. Power den- sity spectra inspected through Aug. 5 show no low-frequency noise (10-500 mHz) in the hard x-ray region, which is unusual for such objects. Using data collected since Aug. 5, we obtain the follow- ing improved location: R.A. = 16h54m.6, Decl. = -39o54' (equinox 2000.0; 1-sigma error along the southeast-to-northwest direction is 0.2 deg and along southwest-northeast is 0.1 deg). This location is about 0.13 deg from the optical candidate reported by Bailyn et al. (IAUC 6050)." The outburst from GRO J1655-40 has ended in the BATSE energy band. The last BATSE detection was on August 15. However significant radio emission is still being reported. D. Campbell-Wilson and R. Hunstead (IAUC 6055), report radio observations of GRO J1655-40 at 843 MHz that show the radio flux rising as the hard x-ray flux is falling, reaching 5.5 Jansky on August 15. Four presentations on BATSE observations were given at IAU Symposium 165 at the Hague. M. Finger presented results on the QPO observed during the outburst the x-ray binary pulsar A0535+262. J. Fishman gave a talk on gamma-ray burst observations and results. C. Koveliotou discussed soft gamma-ray repeaters. W. Paciesas presented observations of the newly discovered x-ray nova GRO J1655-40. Other Announcements: 1) IAU Colloquium ******************************************************************* IAU COLLOQUIUM 151 "FLARES AND FLASHES" As announced earlier this year, IAU Colloquium 151 "Flares and Flashes" will be held in Sonneberg/Germany between December 5-9. This colloquium will cover short-term phenomena on all kinds of objects (late-type stars, T Tauri stars, neutron stars) across the entire electromagnetic spectrum. The deadline for registration and submitting abstracts is October 1, 1994. Details can be found in the second announcement which has just be sent out. It is also available via anonymous ftp from rosat_svc.mpe-garching.mpg.de in the subdirectory outgoing/iau (named iauc151_2announ.ps). ******************************************************************* 2) Education Initiative ================== INITIATIVE to DEVELOP EDUCATION through ASTRONOMY IDEA Research Grants Proposals Due: 30-September-1994 SPECIAL NOTE The Initiative to Develop Education through Astronomy (IDEA) research grants program is very similar in spirit and content to the former Astrophysics Grant Supplements for Education (AGSE) program developed by the NASA Astrophysics Division. There are three major differences and a sufficient number of detailed changes to warrant a careful reading of this announcement before proceeding to write proposals. Please pay special attention to the new list of Evaluation Criteria and to the Budget Guidelines. The three MAJOR differences between the AGSE and IDEA grants programs are summarized below. First, the IDEA grants program will be implemented by the Space Telescope Science Institute, AURA, Inc., which is acting as an agent for NASA. Oversight of program content and proposal review remains with the Astrophysics Division of NASA Headquarters. PROPOSALS MAY BE RELATED TO ANY AREA OF SPACE ASTRONOMY RESEARCH, not just areas associated with the Hubble Space Telescope. Second, the program is open to ALL professionals in astronomy, not just those funded by the NASA Astrophysics Division. However, preference will be given to proposals that include active roles for astronomers who are supported by NASA. Third, there are now two funding categories -- Small grants which are less than or equal to $6,000 (the level at which most proposals will be funded), and Mid-size grants which are between $6,001 and $20,000. PURPOSE The field of astronomy is of widespread interest to the general public. Children, in particular, seem to have an innate fascination with the subject. The broad appeal of astronomy places a special obligation on publicly funded astronomers to use their expertise to enhance education at all levels. The purpose of the IDEA program is to encourage the participation of research astronomers, particularly those funded by NASA, in experimenting with projects that take advantage of their special talents and the excitement of astronomy to promote greater mathematical, technological, and scientific literacy. ELIGIBILITY IDEA grants are a program of NASA's Astrophysics Division, implemented by the Space Telescope Science Institute. To apply for an IDEA grant you must be professional in astronomy. Strong preference will be given to proposals that include the active participation of NASA-supported investigators. Astronomers at ANY institution, including NASA field centers and industry are eligible for this program. PROJECT GUIDELINES The following guidelines apply to all IDEA projects: Emphasis on Collaboration: Preference will be given to proposals that include partners in the professional education community as co-creators, participants and evaluators. You are urged to contact teachers or education specialists in K-12 school districts, Schools of Education at Colleges and Universities, community colleges, science museums, planetariums, aerospace or telecommunications industries, publishing companies, educational radio or television, or professional organizations devoted to science and/or to education (a list of national astronomy/science education groups is available upon request). Proposers from the astronomy community at Universities and Colleges are strongly encouraged to collaborate with Schools or Colleges of Education to engage science education faculty, graduate students in science education, and undergraduate teachers in training in the proposed education activity. If your institution is involved in a NASA Space Grant Consortium, they should at least be aware of your activities, if not involved directly. Intended Audience: IDEA grants are intended to promote math, science, and astronomy education among non-specialists. It is therefore expected that most grants will target K-12 teachers and students or public audiences. However, some consideration will be given to innovative proposals to enhance or improve introductory college courses in astronomy or math/science literacy. In particular, proposals targeting undergraduate or graduate students training for careers in K-12 education are permitted and encouraged. Researcher Involvement / Links to Research: IDEA grant PIs are expected to be active participants in the proposed educational endeavor. All projects must have an astronomy focus, and be related to NASA space astronomy in particular. Innovative projects are especially welcome, particularly ones that place astronomy in an interdisciplinary or multi-cultural context, including efforts that reach beyond the physical sciences to include the arts, social sciences, history, mathematics, and other subjects. Links to Active Learning and Education Reform: A large body of educational research has demonstrated that passive education is relatively ineffective. "Tell me, I forget; Show me, I remember; Involve me, I understand." Preference will be given to IDEA projects that contain meaningful hands-on components related to space astronomy research, and that are centered on the concept of teacher/student as scientist, explorer and discoverer. Projects that involve development of written or audio-visual products should ensure that these products are accompanied by suggested active-learning activities. Such activities should be co-developed with and tested by teachers or otherwise appropriate representatives of the intended audience to ensure their value and suitability to modern science curricula (see IMPORTANT NOTE below). If your proposed educational activity involves teacher training or enhancement, you are encouraged to include teachers who are involved in science education reform and/or who have the ability and interest to share with other teachers what they experience and produce in association with your project. National organizations devoted to science education can help to identify such teachers in your area. IDEA proposers and grantees are encouraged to take advantage of the increasing number of training opportunities for research astronomers interested in educational outreach. ***IMPORTANT NOTE--PLEASE READ*** Educational Activity vs. Educational Products NASA legal policies prohibit offering a grant (instead of a contract) for the sole purpose of generating a potentially marketable end-product such as a video, slide set, or computer software. Experimenting with educational ACTIVITY must be the emphasis of your proposal. Your project may involve the development of an educational product, but this product must be used and assessed in the proposed educational activity. Thus, grants can be awarded for educational activity that might incorporate the use and assessment of a developed educational product. Multiplier Effects and Dissemination: Each IDEA project should have the potential for multiplying its impact beyond its direct effect. This is most likely achieved through partnerships with the professional communities in education, communication and/or dissemination. For example, you might work with teachers who reach out to their students or to other teachers. Or you might work directly with a science museum director or a producer of educational television on a project that will touch teachers and the general public. Another possibility is to collaborate with experienced disseminators who can more broadly distribute a high-quality, teacher-tested educational product created by your project efforts. Telecommunications technologies offer a good means to propagate your efforts, but bear in mind that many classroom teachers do not yet have access to the Internet. Sharing the methods and evaluation (see section below) of your educational efforts directly with professional colleagues is also strongly encouraged. Evaluation/Assessment: All IDEA proposals must have a clearly described plan for evaluating the effectiveness of the proposed project. It is recognized that a thorough evaluation can be a time-consuming professional process. For the purposes of IDEA grants, you are being asked only for a simple analysis of your experimental efforts in education. To do this, your proposal must articulate testable goals and the methods you will use to determine whether you succeed in achieving them (e.g. giving pre- and post tests of science knowledge, collecting questionnaires from participants, keeping track of contact hours with teachers and classroom hours spent on astronomy as a result of your efforts). All projects must report to NASA their successes and failures via a final report (see later section for the desired format of this report). NASA will make these reports available to other research astronomers who are looking for ways to begin exploring their roles in educational outreach. PROPOSAL EVALUATION CRITERIA Consistent with these project guidelines all IDEA grant proposals will be assessed according to the following list of evaluation criteria. All of these factors (a-f) are important and will be considered in the evaluation of each proposal. a) Evidence of the existence of mutually beneficial partnerships between research astronomers and professionals in education for the purpose of promoting math and science literacy using the context of astronomy. b) Contribution to the education and training of members of groups who are currently underrepresented in the physical sciences and mathematics. c) Relationship to NASA's astronomy research, appropriate leveraging of the existing infrastructures in research and education, and where appropriate, coordination with other NASA-sponsored educational activities. d) Evidence that the investigator team is familiar with science education reform and effective techniques in science education. e) Feasibility of plans for dissemination or other multiplier effects intended to maximize the impact of the project or its adoption by others. f) Potential educational effectiveness as demonstrated by an appropriate plan for assessing of the value to the intended audience, and by the involvement of educators at the targeted educational level in development and implementation. IDEAS FOR POSSIBLE PROJECT AREAS Subject to the above guidelines and evaluation criteria, any innovative proposal will be considered. The following areas are of particular interest, but you should not feel confined by these. A directory of information about projects that were supported by 1992 grant awards is available upon request. 1) Astronomy workshops for school teachers and/or teachers in training. Workshops should help teachers to learn how they can incorporate astronomy into their regular classroom curricula. Workshops for teachers at any grade level can be funded, but some preference will be given to workshops for elementary school teachers that involve the development of age-appropriate classroom activities. If possible, workshops should offer college credit. 2) Innovative projects for bringing the excitement of astronomy to women and underrepresented cultural groups. Innovative ideas for using astronomy to excite scientific interest among women and underrepresented cultural groups are especially encouraged. Projects might include activities that bring students and their teachers in for special "astronomy days" (or nights), or activities that send astronomers (including post-docs, graduate or undergraduate students studying astronomy) out to schools with large "minority" enrollments. Multi-cultural and nontraditional (e.g. wilderness experiences) approaches to astronomy are also encouraged. 3) Use of interactive, educational software involving space astronomy data. Astronomical science relies heavily on computers for the storage, transfer and analysis of astrophysical data. Projects are sought that can translate modern astrophysical data into interactive electronic formats that are useful and accessible to teachers of astronomy at all levels. It is expected that any educational software you create as a part of your grant activity will be made available for NASA distribution. 4) Educational writing or consulting that uses astronomy to improve public understanding and appreciation of science. Projects that involve the participation of astronomers in writing or consulting for non-profit public outreach opportunities that have very large audiences are of special interest. This might include collaborations with established science outreach programs in the media: radio, television or newspapers; or in informal science education settings such as science museums and planetaria. BUDGET GUIDELINES Please be sure that you follow the guidelines below in preparing your IDEA grant budget. Maximum Awards The spirit of the IDEA grants program is to encourage all research astronomers to devote a small fraction of their total efforts toward experimentation with educational projects. Thus, it is preferable to fund many small projects, facilitating the participation of many astronomers in education, rather than funding fewer large projects. IDEA proposals may be made in either of two categories: Small Projects or Mid-size Projects. Small Projects are limited to $6,000; it is expected that most of the IDEA grant awards will be made in this category. Mid-size Projects may request between $6001 and $20,000; it is expected that 0-5 awards will be made in this category. In general, a PI may submit no more than one proposal in each category. If you have received an Astrophysics Grant Supplement for Education (AGSE) in 1991 , 1992, and/or 1993, you may apply to the 1994 IDEA grants program for a new project or to expand and enhance your existing project. IF YOU ARE EXPANDING ON A PREVIOUSLY FUNDED PROJECT, YOU MUST INCLUDE WITH YOUR PROPOSAL A ONE-PAGE SUMMARY, STATING EVIDENCE OF EFFECTIVENESS, LESSONS LEARNED, PLANNED IMPROVEMENTS, AND ANY HUMAN OR FINANCIAL RESOURCES THAT HAVE BEEN LEVERAGED BY YOUR PREVIOUS GRANT. Also, please note, that the proposal guidelines in 1994 contain significant changes to those from previous years. Salary Support You may request salary support for hiring individuals to help bring your project to fruition, including undergraduate assistants, school teachers, teachers in training, and others. Salary support to astronomers may be funded if the proposal can clearly demonstrate that such support is essential to the success of the educational project. Bear in mind that it is not the purpose of this program to subsidize astronomical research. Computer Hardware Because of the limited funds available for this program, hardware requests are unlikely to be accepted. In particular, this program may not be used to purchase hardware that will be used for purposes other than the direct support of your education project. You must also certify that when your project is complete, the ongoing use of any hardware purchased will be for educational purposes. Other Equipment Requests for purchase of major equipment (e.g., telescopes, software, etc.) will be evaluated on a case-by-case basis. Past experience, however, has shown they are unlikely to be approved. As a guideline, remember that the purpose of this program is to involve you, the researcher, in the educational process. It is not our intent to purchase equipment for general use in schools, museums, planetariums or other institutions. Materials and Dissemination You may request funds for the purchase of any materials needed in the development of your project, or for costs associated with disseminating your work. You may also request funds for materials that will be distributed to teachers as part of a workshop. In order to achieve maximum leverage from IDEA funds, please remember that NASA Teacher Resource Centers and the Public Affairs Offices in NASA Centers and Institutes have FREE outreach materials available for educational purposes. NASA also has other dissemination mechanisms (e.g. NASA TV, and SpaceLink (Internet)) that might be of use to you, both for obtaining access to educational products and for disseminating the results of your own work. More information about NASA dissemination mechanisms will be provided upon request. Travel, Honoraria, Refreshments Local travel, expenses, or tuition for teachers participating in workshops are generally acceptable. It will be more difficult to make a convincing case for long distance travel, honoraria for speakers, or other large expenditures for single individuals. Travel support for an astronomy researcher who will attend a workshop or conference to learn about effective educational outreach and/or science education reform is acceptable as long as it does not dominate the total budget request. Refreshments or meals may not be funded by this program, although the special value of social events held in conjunction with outreach activities is well recognized. Other It is impossible to foresee all possible types of budget requests. Any items not covered above will be considered on a case-by-case basis, subject to legal restrictions, NASA policy, and the spirit of IDEA grants program. Institutional Overhead In many cases, IDEA grants will be building upon a base of much larger federally funded research activities conducted by IDEA grant investigators. Since the IDEA grants are quite small and are intended to stimulate outreach activities that are of direct social benefit, strong preference will be given to proposals whose administrative costs are waived or reduced below 20% of the proposed amount. HOW TO REQUEST AN IDEA GRANT The proposal process is being kept as simple as possible while securing all the information the Review Panel will need to critically evaluate your proposal. Both goals will be served by following the format below. Please constrain your proposals to 3-5 pages in length, plus cover pages, budget pages, and special forms. Proposals should include each of the following sections: 1) Cover Page: List the title of your proposal, the names, titles and affiliations of the investigators, the total amount of funds requested for the proposed work, and a 150-200 word abstract of your educational project. Also, be sure to provide the SIGNATURES OF APPROPRIATE OFFICIALS AT YOUR INSTITUTION. 2) Audience and Education Collaborators: Specifically identify the intended audience for your proposed project, and how your collaborators will help ensure that you can effectively reach that audience. 3) Project Description: Describe the mechanics of your proposed project. Be sure to clearly and explicitly address the PROJECT GUIDELINES and proposal EVALUATION CRITERIA described above. 4) Budget Explanations: Briefly justify each item in your budget, paying close attention to the BUDGET GUIDELINES above. If applicable, be sure to include a statement indicating any waiver or reduction of institutional overhead. Please also indicate the possibility of matching funds, in-kind contributions, or other opportunities to leverage this award for larger effect. 5) Budget Page: Attach a table with the itemization of your budget. 6) Special Forms: Attach to the original and two hard-copies (as opposed to the electronic copy) of your proposal, two special forms, both available through your local contracts and grants organization. These are: 1) Certification of a Drug Free Workplace, and 2) Debarment and Suspension. GRANT PERIOD The performance period for 1994 IDEA grants will end one year after the grant money is received. It is understood that certain types of educational activities require particular phasing with the academic year, and thus allowances will be made for no-cost extensions. FINAL REPORTS The IDEA research grants program is experimental in nature. In order to evaluate the success of the program, each supported project should produce a brief (1-2 pages) final report. The final report should be submitted by email to idea@stsci.edu. It should include: a) the IDEA grant PI's position, institution, and source of other NASA support (if applicable). b) the original IDEA proposal abstract c) a brief description of any fundamental changes that were made to your original plan, together with the rationale for those changes. d) a list of the positive and negative lessons learned from your experience. e) a quantitative estimate about what human and/or financial resources have been leveraged by your IDEA grant activity. If you have developed an educational product or a model proposal for an IDEA grant that may be of use to other educators or researchers, please emphasize this in your final report. Sending well-labeled photos or illustrations of your activities is also encouraged. REVIEW OF PROPOSALS The formal evaluation of IDEA grant proposals will be done by a Review Panel composed of program managers from NASA, astronomers, and educators. The Astrophysics Division at NASA Headquarters will have oversight and approval authority for the review process. The panel will consider the merit of each proposal in light of the guidelines and evaluation criteria listed above. SUBMISSION OF PROPOSALS Proposals for the IDEA grants are due by close of business on 30 September 1994. Decisions will be announced 4-6 weeks later. Send proposals (including the unsigned cover page, project description and budget sections) electronically (text-only) to: idea@stsci.edu ***************AND************** Send the complete original and 2 complete hard copies (including the SIGNED cover page and the appropriate special forms as well as the project description and budget sections) to: Attn.: Project Scientist for Education Space Telescope Science Institute 3700 San Martin Drive Baltimore, Maryland 21218 INQUIRIES ABOUT THE PROPOSAL PROCESS Inquiries about the PROPOSAL process should be made directly to the Space Telescope Science Institute: idea@stsci.edu INQUIRIES ABOUT THE REVIEW PROCESS Inquiries about the REVIEW process should be made directly to the Education Officer in the Astrophysics Division at NASA Headquarters: idea@gm.ossa.hq.nasa.gov Please check your local FTP site or NASA HQ/STScI WWW home pages for any changes which may be made to this announcement.