TITLE: GCN CIRCULAR NUMBER: 7868 SUBJECT: Swift observations of BAT Slew Survey event (Trigger=010) DATE: 08/06/11 14:43:43 GMT FROM: Phil Evans at U of Leicester E. Troja (U. Leicester/INAF-IASFPA), S. T. Holland (CRESST/USRA/GSFC), A. Copete (Harvard), J. Grindlay (Harvard), K. L. Page (U. Leicester), P. A. Evans (U. Leicester), S. Barthelmy (GSFC) report: At 09:50:17 UT on 2008-06-02, BAT detected a source during a spacecraft slewing interval (when normal BAT triggering is disabled). This event (ID Num=010) was detected using the BAT Slew Survey (BATSS) method. The location is RA(J2000) = 00h 17m 41s Dec(J2000) = +48d 34m 12s with an uncertainty of 6.3 arcmin. This was initially distributed as a GCN/BAT_SLEW_POS Notice at 21:12 UT, 11.3 hrs after the slew. A 6 ks ToO observation of the location started at 22:01 UT, 12.2 hrs after the slew. XRT observation revealed a faint source (~3 x 10-3 cts/s) with a possible fading behavior. This source is located at : RA(J2000)= 00h 18h 05.37s Dec(J2000)=+48d 38h 29.4s with an uncertainty of 8.6 arcsec (90% confidence). No other candidate afterglow was found, down to a 3 sigma upper limit of 3 x 10-3 cts/s. UVOT observations detected two sources within the XRT error circle, whose positions are consistent with catalogued objects. The colours of these sources are: (v-b)_0 = 0.76, (u-b)_0 = 0.51, suggestive of a G2I star (v-b)_0 = 0.48, (u-b)_0 =-0.45 The colours have been corrected for the Galactic reddening of E(B-V)=0.11 mag along the line of sight (Schlegel et al., 1998). No evidence for variability is observed in either of these sources, and it is not possible to determine whether one of them is the counterpart of the XRT source. In order to check the variability of the XRT source, further observations with Swift were performed. The source is not detected in 6 ks of exposure, taken from 2.6 d to 3.5 d after the slew. In later observations, taken from 7.6 d to 8.1 d after the slew (6 ks of exposure in PC mode), the X-ray source is clearly detected at a count rate of (2.2+/-0.7) x 10-3 cts/s, consistent with the first detection. We conclude that this source is unassociated to the BATSS event.