TITLE: GCN CIRCULAR NUMBER: 6178 SUBJECT: GRB 070306: NOT observations DATE: 07/03/07 15:24:07 GMT FROM: Daniele Malesani at Niels Bohr Inst,Dark Cosmology Center D. Malesani (DARK/NBI), A.O. Jaunsen (Univ. Oslo), C.C. Thoene, J. Hjorth (DARK/NBI), D. Paraficz (NOT), E. Leitet, and B. Caldwell (Univ. Uppsala), report on behalf of a larger collaboration: We observed the field of GRB 070306 (Pandey et al., GCN 6169) with the NOT equipped with StanCam. Imaging was carried out in the I filter, starting on Mar 6.946 UT (6 hr after the GRB), with a seeing of 1". The object visible in the SDSS (SDSS J095223.31+102855.4) and reported by Rol et al. (GCN 6174) and Levan et al. (GCN 6176) is seen in our images. Preliminary photometry calibrated against the SDSS i-band magnitudes (Cool et al., GCN 6170) provides i(AB) = 22.65+-0.30 (mean time Mar 6.954 UT). This is consistent, within the large errors, with the value measured in the SDSS for this object: i(AB) = 22.8+-0.4, and indicates little contribution from the afterglow in the I band at the epoch of our observation. Comparison with the magnitudes reported by Rol et al. (GCN 6174) further suggests that either the host galaxy, or the afterglow, or both, are quite red. Using the X-ray flux at 6 hr from Nat Butler's web page (http://astro.berkeley.edu/~nat/swift/00263361/bat_xrt.jpg; see also Page et al., GCN 6172), we can measure a limit on the broad-band spectral index beta_OX < 0.2 at 6 hr after the GRB. According to the criterion by Jakobsson et al. (2004, ApJ, 617, L21), this burst is classified as dark. The detection of the relatively bright host in the SDSS g filter and the presence of a large absorbing column in the X-ray spectrum (Page et al., GCN 6172; Grupe et al. 2007, AJ, in press; astro-ph/0612104) imply the redshift is not very large. Therefore this afterglow was likely suffering significant dust extinction.