TITLE: GCN GRB OBSERVATION REPORT NUMBER: 196 SUBJECT: Optical Observations of GRB 981220 DATE: 99/01/20 19:15:53 GMT FROM: Josh Bloom at CIT Optical Observations of GRB 981220 J. S. Bloom, S. G. Djorgovski, S. R. Kulkarni (CIT), J. Brauher (IPAC), D. A. Frail (NRAO), R. Goodrich, F. Chaffee (CARA) report on behalf of the Caltech-NRAO-CARA GRB Collaboration: "On 14 January 1999 UT we imaged the region of the radio transient (GCN #168; GCN #170) of GRB 981220 (GCN #159; GCN #160) with the Keck II 10-m telescope. Total integration time in R-band was 1300-s in ~0.6 arcsec seeing (FWHM). An astrometric plate solution was obtained on the stacked image using the USNO-A2.0 catalogue. The r.m.s. errors of the 26 tie stars surrounding the radio position was 0.24 arcsec (in ra) and 0.18 arcsec (in dec). A Landolt standard field (PG0231+051) was also observed for photometric calibration. Our Keck images can be found at the web location, http://astro.caltech.edu/~jsb/GRB/grb981220.html. There are two sources in the vicinity of the radio transient, 'J' and 'K'. Source 'J' coincides with the radio position as reported earlier (GCN #176). On Jan 14.30, the magnitudes of source 'J' and 'K' are respectively 26.4 (+/- 0.3 statistical; +/- 0.4 zero-point error) and R = 25.6 (+/- 0.2 statistical; +/- 0.4 zero-point error); the zero-point error includes uncertainties in the local sky level determination, aperture correction, and the photometric zero-point of the standard stars. We note that on Dec 23.4 1998 (GCN #176) both 'J' and 'K' have comparable brightness whereas 'J' is clearly fainter than 'K' in the Jan 14.30 image. We conclude that the optical source coincident with the radio transient position has faded by ~0.8 mag between the two epochs. Since the inferred decay is shallower than that found in other GRB afterglow, we suggest that the first epoch flux measure of the optical transient (GCN #176) was partly contaminated by the host galaxy. Masetti et al. (GCN #179) had claimed that the source at the radio position had a 4-arcsec extension. As can be seen from our images, the extension is likely an artifact resulting from poorer seeing in the B-band image of Masetti et al. We conclude that source 'J' is the host galaxy of GRB 981220 and it is not unusually large but has typical angular size of other host galaxies. This message can be cited."