TITLE: GCN CIRCULAR NUMBER: 7865 SUBJECT: GRB 080603B - TLS 2nd Epoch: Another Break DATE: 08/06/09 02:33:11 GMT FROM: Alexander Kann at TLS Tautenburg D. A. Kann, U. Laux and S. Ertel (TLS Tautenburg) report: We observed again the field of the Swift GRB 080603B (Mangano et al., GCN 7794) with the TLS 1.34m Schmidt telescope. The observing conditions changed rapidly, from passing clouds and moonlight to excellent conditions. We obtained a total of 11 x 600 sec images in the R band. The first five images were lost due to high background as well as passing clouds. We stacked the final six images, which have a mid-time of June 8.98085. The afterglow (Rujopakarn, Guver, & Smith, GCN 7792) is not detected anymore in the stack. Using the same comparison star as Kann et al. (GCN 7823), we derive a 2 sigma upper limit of R > 23.7 at 5.132644 days after the GRB. Comparing this value with the one determined at 1.16 days after the GRB by Kann et al. (GCN 7823) (R = 21.32), we find a decay slope alpha > 1.47. While this does not allow any assertion on the reality of the steep decay slope (alpha ~ 2.5) reported by Kann et al. (GCN 7823), it is steeper than the slope reported (alpha_R=-1.14+/-0.09) by Zhuchkov et al. (GCN 7803) and confirmed by Xin et al. (GCN 7814), indicating that another break in the light curve must have occurred, independent of calibration issues. As the slope reported by Zhuchkov et al. (GCN 7803) is much too shallow to be a post-jet break slope, this indicates that the second break is very probably a jet break. The slope reported by Kann et al. (GCN 7823) is in accordance with a post-jet break slope. This then leads to the interesting question of the origin of the first break Zhuchkov et al. detected, as it is much to strong to be a cooling break (Delta alpha_R = 0.55 versus the theoretical value of Delta alpha = 0.25 for a cooling break). This message may be cited.