TITLE: GCN CIRCULAR NUMBER: 30657 SUBJECT: Konus-Wind detection of GRB 210818A DATE: 21/08/18 18:23:06 GMT FROM: Dmitry Frederiks at Ioffe Institute D. Frederiks, S. Golenetskii, A.Lysenko, A. Ridnaia, D. Svinkin, A. Tsvetkova, M. Ulanov, and T. Cline, on behalf of the Konus-Wind team, report: The long GRB 210818A (Swift detection: Beardmore et al., GCN 30652; AGILE detection: Ursi et al., GCN 30654) triggered Konus-Wind (KW) at T0=3729.710 s UT (01:02:09.710). The burst light curve started at ~T0 with a bright, short (<0.5s), hard-spectrum initial pulse, which was followed, after a ~0.5 s interval, by a similarly bright and hard, multi-peaked emission, which gradually decays until ~T0+90 s. We also note a QPO-like behavior of the light curve in the interval from ~T0+1.6 s to ~T0+3.2 s, with the quasi period of ~0.21 s. The emission is seen up to ~7 MeV. The Konus-Wind light curve of this GRB is available at http://www.ioffe.ru/LEA/GRBs/GRB210818_T03729/ As observed by Konus-Wind, the burst had a fluence of (2.67 ± 0.12)x10^-4 erg/cm^2 and a 64-ms peak energy flux, measured from T0 + 0.128 s, of (5.12 ± 0.54)x10^-5 erg/cm^2/s (both in the 20 keV - 10 MeV energy range). The time-averaged spectrum of the burst (measured from T0 to T0+80.640 s) is best fit in the 20 keV - 20 MeV range by a power law with exponential cutoff (CPL) model: dN/dE ~ (E^alpha)*exp(-E*(2+alpha)/Ep) with alpha = -0.99(-0.03,+0.03) and Ep = 1107(-71,+78) keV (chi2 = 117/98 dof). Fitting this spectrum by a Band function yields the same alpha and Ep, and an upper limit on the high energy photon index: beta < -3.2 (chi2 = 117/97 dof). The spectrum near the peak count rate (measured from T0 to T0+0.256 s, that corresponds to the short initial pulse) is best fit in the 20 keV - 20 MeV range by the CPL model with alpha = -0.28(-0.13,+0.14) and Ep = 1247(-133,+47) keV (chi2 = 38/58 dof). Fitting this spectrum by a Band function yields the same alpha and Ep, and an upper limit on the high energy photon index: beta < -3.4 (chi2 = 38/57 dof). All the quoted errors are estimated at the 90% confidence level. All the presented results are preliminary.