TITLE: GCN CIRCULAR NUMBER: 27012 SUBJECT: GRB 200205B: Swift-BAT refined analysis DATE: 20/02/08 02:03:36 GMT FROM: Amy Lien at GSFC T. N. Ukwatta (LANL), S. D. Barthelmy (GSFC), J. R. Cummings (CPI), P. A. Evans (U Leicester), H. A. Krimm (NSF), S. Laha (GSFC/UMBC), A. Y. Lien (GSFC/UMBC), C. B. Markwardt (GSFC), D. M. Palmer (LANL), T. Sakamoto (AGU), M. Stamatikos (OSU) (i.e. the Swift-BAT team): Using the data set from T-239 to T+1361 sec from the recent telemetry downlink, we report further analysis of BAT GRB 200205B (trigger #954519 and #954520) (Evans et al., GCN Circ. 26993). We have combined the data from two triggers (#954519 and #954520) for the analysis. All the times in this circular are relative to the trigger time from #954519. The BAT ground-calculated position is RA, Dec = 107.760, -56.488 deg which is RA(J2000) = 07h 11m 02.3s Dec(J2000) = -56d 29' 18.1" with an uncertainty of 1.8 arcmin, (radius, sys+stat, 90% containment). The partial coding was 47%. The mask-weighted light curve shows several pulses that start from ~T+20 s and end at ~T+550 s. The first prominent pulse occurs at ~T+60 s, followed by another significant structure with several overlapping pulses from ~T+380 s to ~T+520 s. There is a data gap from T+63 s to T+160 s, likely due to problems of saving data because of the double triggers. T90 (15-350 keV) is 458.0 +- 5.4 sec (estimated error including systematics). Because of the data gap for part of the first pulse, we performed the time-averaged spectrum for the interval of the second multi-pulse structure from T+387.008 to T+520.396 sec. This interval is best fit by a power law with an exponential cutoff. This fit gives a photon index 1.36 +- 0.22, and Epeak of 65.6 +- 10.8 keV (chi squared 41.92 for 56 d.o.f.). For this model the total fluence in the 15-150 keV band is 5.4 +- 0.2 x 10^-6 erg/cm2 and the 1-sec peak flux measured from T+438 sec in the 15-150 keV band is 2.0 +- 0.2 ph/cm2/sec. A fit to a simple power law gives a photon index of 1.84 +- 0.05 (chi squared 58.00 for 57 d.o.f.). All the quoted errors are at the 90% confidence level. The results of the batgrbproduct analysis are available at http://gcn.gsfc.nasa.gov/notices_s/954519/BA/