TITLE: GCN CIRCULAR NUMBER: 21981 SUBJECT: GRB 171007A: Swift-BAT refined analysis DATE: 17/10/08 16:57:32 GMT FROM: Amy Lien at GSFC S. D. Barthelmy (GSFC), J. K. Cannizzo (NASA/UMBC), J. R. Cummings (CPI), H. A. Krimm (NSF/USRA), A. Y. Lien (GSFC/UMBC), C. B. Markwardt (GSFC), J. P. Norris (BSU), D. M. Palmer (LANL), T. Sakamoto (AGU), M. Stamatikos (OSU), T. N. Ukwatta (LANL) (i.e. the Swift-BAT team): Using the data set from T-239 to T+963 sec from the recent telemetry downlink, we report further analysis of BAT GRB 171007A (trigger #777215) (Cannizzo et al., GCN Circ. 21976). The BAT ground-calculated position is RA, Dec = 135.635, 42.930 deg which is RA(J2000) = 09h 02m 32.5s Dec(J2000) = +42d 55' 47.4" with an uncertainty of 3.6 arcmin, (radius, sys+stat, 90% containment). The partial coding was 100%. The mask-weighted light curve shows a short spike that start at ~ T-0.1 s and ends at ~ T+2.9 s. There is some weak emission lasting till ~T+80 s. T90 (15-350 keV) is 105 +- 45 sec (estimated error including systematics). The time-averaged spectrum from T-0.08 to T+107.92 sec is best fit by a simple power-law model. The power law index of the time-averaged spectrum is 1.38 +- 0.52. The fluence in the 15-150 keV band is 2.9 +- 1.1 x 10^-7 erg/cm2. The 1-sec peak photon flux measured from T+0.92 sec in the 15-150 keV band is 0.4 +- 0.1 ph/cm2/sec. All the quoted errors are at the 90% confidence level. Although the burst is weak and the short spike is ~ 3 s, the structure of the burst shows similarity to those of short GRBs with extended emission. We thus perform further analysis on the short spike and the tail emission. The spectrum of the short spike from T-0.08 to T+2.92 sec is best fit by a simple power-law model, with power-law index of 0.83 +- 0.35 and fluence (15-150 keV) of 1.0 +- 0.2 x 10^-7 erg/cm2. The spectrum of the tail emission from T+2.92 to T+107.92 sec is best fit by a simple power-law model, with power-law index of 1.67 +- 0.73 and fluence (15-150 keV) of 1.8 +- 1.0 x 10^-7 erg/cm2. These values are consistent with those of short GRBs with extended emission (Lien & Sakamoto et al. 2016). The lag analysis is unconstrained due to the weakness of this burst. The results of the batgrbproduct analysis are available at http://gcn.gsfc.nasa.gov/notices_s/777215/BA/