TITLE: GCN GRB OBSERVATION REPORT NUMBER: 2081 SUBJECT: GRB 030329, light curve and SN prediction DATE: 03/04/03 14:10:56 GMT FROM: Sylvio Klose at TLS Tautenburg A. Zeh, S. Klose (Thueringer Landessternwarte Tautenburg), J. Greiner (MPE Garching), report: Using the light curves of SN 1998bw (Galama et al. 1998, Nature 395, 670) as a template we have analyzed what color changes are expected to be seen in the optical transient following GRB 030329 if a supernova component would appear. Ingredients: ------------ 1) SN 1998bw: - A_V = 0.20 mag (Woosley, Eastman, & Schmidt 1999, ApJ 516, 792) - no time delay between the onset of the SN and the onset of the GRB - A_V(host) = 0.0 mag 2) The host galaxy: - z = 0.1685 (Greiner et al. 2003, GCN 2020) - a negligible host flux in BVRI (based on R>22.5; Blake & Bloom 2003, GCN 2011) - A_V(Galaxy) at (l, b) = 217.07, b = 60.68: E(B-V) = 0.025 (Schlegel, Finkbeiner, & Davis 1998, ApJ 500, 525), - R_V = 3.1 3) The GRB afterglow: - Considering published GCN R-band data, analyzed according to Beuermann et al. (1999, A&A 352, L26), we find: alpha_1 = 0.85 +/- 0.04 alpha_2 = 1.55 +/- 0.02 t_break = 0.42 +/- 0.03 days, after ignoring the several re-brightenings during the last days - colors (best fit): B-V = 0.39 mag V-R = 0.34 mag R-I = 0.47 mag - we have taken into account the latest re-brightening episode and assumed that a) alpha_2 remains constant and b) the color of the afterglow does not change Output cocktail: ---------------- - Fig. 1: the light curve - Fig. 2: the expected color evolution We note that differences in the reported value for alpha_2 (cf. Li et al. 2003, GCN 2078) can be explained by slightly different selection criteria for the data chosen to perform the numerical fit. http://www.tls-tautenburg.de/research/klose/grb.html Warning: -------- These results are based on a simple toy model. They provide only a hint about what the strength of the SN signal could be since most SN bumps found so far had a brightness of only 30-80% of SN 1998bw.