TITLE: GCN CIRCULAR NUMBER: 10399 SUBJECT: GRB 100205A: Keck limits on an underlying host galaxy DATE: 10/02/10 13:06:10 GMT FROM: Daniel Perley at U.C. Berkeley D. A. Perley, J. S. Bloom, S. B. Cenko, B. E. Cobb, A. N. Morgan, A. A. Miller, and C. R. Klein (UC Berkeley) report: We conducted a deep optical imaging integration on the field of GRB 100205A (Racusin et al., GCN 10361) using LRIS on the Keck I 10m telescope starting at 09:48 UT on 2010 Feb 7. We integrated for a total exposure time of 4000 seconds in g-band and 3770 seconds in R-band simultaneously under clear skies but variable and generally poor seeing conditions (1.5 arcsec average). The mid-point of the integration was at 10:28 UT. We detect no source at the position of the putative infrared afterglow (Tanvir et al., GCN 10366). Calibrating relative to USNOB1.0, we measure limiting magnitudes (3-sigma) of: R > 26.7 g > 26.6 as measured at the afterglow location. A faint source is marginally detected (<2 sigma) in R-band only at the northwestern edge of the XRT error circle (Evans et al., GCN 10367), not consistent with the position of the infrared afterglow. We also stacked the R-band and g-band images together to create a white-light composite image. There is no significant detection in this image, with an approximate limiting magnitude of White > 27 mag. All properties of this GRB are consistent with it being at high redshift: * Lack of optical detection starting at early times (e.g. Malesani et al., GCN 10362; Updike et al., GCN 10364; Cobb et al, GCN 10365) * An apparently fading afterglow candidate detected only in H- and K-bands (Cucchiara et al., GCN 10374; Im et al., GCN 10398) * Limited X-ray absorption: excess N_H(z=0) = 7(+6/-5) x 10^20 cm^-2 (Starling and Racusin, GCN 10369), generally suggestive of higher redshift (Grupe et al. 2007, AJ 133:2216G) and inconsistent with the alternative hypothesis of a large extinction column at low redshift for typical values of A_V/N_H. * Lack of host galaxy to deep limits (Perley et al. 2009, AJ 138:1690) As mentioned by Cucchiara et al., the implied redshift of this GRB if the red H-K color is due to Lyman-alpha absorption would be z ~ 11-13. However, significant dust absorption at intermediate redshift (e.g., A_V~3 mag at z~4) is still generally consistent with the available data, and unfortunately the X-ray afterglow is too faint to impose meaningful constraints on extinction in the K-band during the Gemini observation. An image of the field is posted to: http://lyra.berkeley.edu/~dperley/100205a/100205a_keck_gR.png We encourage continued deep infrared follow-up of the field.