TITLE: GCN CIRCULAR NUMBER: 19438 SUBJECT: Konus-Wind observation of a bright burst from SGR 1935+2154 DATE: 16/05/19 14:45:17 GMT FROM: Anna Kozlova at Ioffe Institute A. Kozlova, S. Golenetskii, R. Aptekar, D. Frederiks, P. Oleynik, M. Ulanov, D. Svinkin, A. Tsvetkova, A. Lysenko, and T. Cline, on behalf of the Konus-Wind team, report: The bright, short-duration burst from SGR 1935+2154 (Swift-BAT trigger #686761: D'Avanzo et al., GCN Circ. 19433; Fermi GBM trigger #bn160518382: Younes, GCN Circ. 19437) triggered Konus-Wind at T0=32964.102 s UT (09:09:24.102). The burst light curve shows a single pulse with a total duration of 150 ms. The emission is seen up to ~200 keV. The Konus-Wind light curve of this GRB is available at http://www.ioffe.ru/LEA/SGRs/160518_T32964/ As observed by Konus-Wind, the burst had a fluence of 1.62(-0.07,+0.07)x10^-6 erg/cm2, and a 16-ms peak flux, measured from T0+0.014 s, of 1.53(-0.15,+0.15)x10^-5 erg/cm2/s (both in the 20 - 200 keV energy range). The time-averaged spectrum of the burst (measured from T0 to T0+0.128 s) is equally well fit in the 20 - 200 keV range by a power law with exponential cutoff (CPL) model: dN/dE ~ (E^alpha)*exp(-E*(2+alpha)/Ep) and by a sum of two blackbody functions (2BB). The CPL model best fit parameters are: alpha = 0.23 (-0.55,+0.61) and Ep = 29 (-3,+2) keV (chi2 = 8/15 dof). The 2BB fit to this spectrum yields the cool BB temperature kT1 = 4.9 (-2.2,+2.1) keV and the hot BB temperature kT2 = 9.8 (-1.0,+2.5) keV (chi2=8/14 dof). Assuming isotropic emission and the distance to the source of 9.1 kpc (Gaensler, GCN Circ.16533; Pavlovic et al., 2013; Kozlova et al., 2016, arXiv:1605.02993), we estimate the total energy release in the burst E_tot is ~1.6x10^40 erg and the peak luminosity, L_max, is ~1.5x10^41 erg/s (both in the 20-200 keV range). Although this burst is more than order of magnitude less energetic than the 1.7s-long "intermediate" flare (IF) from this source on 2015 April 12 (Kozlova et al., 2016), its peak luminosity is almost comparable to that of the IF. All the quoted errors are at the 90% confidence level. All the quoted values are preliminary.